|
| |
| |
Essential
Architecture- London Millenium
Footbridge |
|
architect
|
Arup Associates,
Norman Foster and Sir
Anthony Caro |
|
location
|
crossing the River Thames in London,
England, between the existing Southwark Bridge and Blackfriars Bridge,
linking Bankside with the City |
|
date
|
2000 |
|
style
|
High-Tech Modern |
|
construction
|
steel |
|
type
|
Bridge |
|
|
  |
|
|
Painting- Image copyright Doug Myers. |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
.jpg) |
|
|
 |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
The London Millennium Footbridge is a pedestrian-only steel suspension
bridge crossing the River Thames in London, England, between the
existing Southwark Bridge and Blackfriars Bridge, linking Bankside with
the City. It was the first new bridge across the Thames in London since
Tower Bridge in 1894 and it is owned and maintained by Bridge House
Estates, a charitable trust overseen by the Corporation of London.
The south end of the bridge is near Globe Theatre, the Bankside
Gallery and Tate Modern, the north end next to the City of London School
below St Paul's Cathedral. The bridge alignment is such that a clear
view of St Paul's south facade is presented from across the river,
framed by the bridge supports, thus providing one of London's most
photogenic views of the cathedral.
Design
The design of the bridge was the subject of a
competition organised in 1996 by Southwark council. The winning entry
was an innovative "blade of light" effort from Arup, Foster and Partners
and Sir Anthony Caro. Due to height restrictions, and to improve the
view, the bridge's suspension design had the supporting cables below the
deck level, giving a very shallow profile. The bridge has two river
piers and is made of three main sections of 81m, 144m and 108m (North to
South) with a total structure length of 325m; the aluminium deck is 4m
wide. The eight suspension cables are tensioned to pull with a force of
2,000 tons against the piers set into each bank — enough to support a
working load of 5,000 people on the bridge at one time.
History
The bridge from St Paul's after opening: long queues formed as
attempts were made to limit vibrations
Construction began in late 1998 with the main works beginning on
April 28, 1999 by Monberg Thorsen and McAlpine. The bridge was completed
at a cost of £18.2m (£2.2m over budget) and opened on June 10, 2000 (2
months late) but unexpected lateral vibration (resonant structural
response) caused the bridge to be closed on June 12 for modifications.
The movements were produced by the sheer numbers of pedestrians (90,000
users in the first day, with up to 2,000 on the bridge at any one time).
The bridge was on the route of a major charity walk and it was an
exceptionally fine day. The initial small vibrations encouraged (or even
obliged) the users to walk in synchronisation with the sway, increasing
the effect even when the bridge was comparatively lightly loaded at the
beginning of the day. This swaying motion earned it the nickname the
Wobbly Bridge.
Attempts were made to limit the number of people crossing the
bridge: this led to long queues, but dampened neither public enthusiasm
for what was something of a white-knuckle ride, nor the vibrations
themselves. The closure of the bridge only three days after opening
attracted public criticism, as another high-profile British millennium
project suffered an embarrassing setback, akin to how many saw the
Millennium Dome.
Resonant vibrational modes have been well understood in bridge
designs following the failure of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. However not
much notice had been given to pedestrian excited lateral motion. This
motion was caused by the human reaction to small lateral movements in
the bridge, which set up a driven harmonic motion in the bridge. As such
the motion was not anticipated by the computational analysis of the
bridge prior to construction. It is often thought that the unusually low
profile of the suspension cables contributed to the problem, but an
analysis by the structural engineer, Arup, shows that it can occur in
any bridge, suspension or otherwise, which happens to have the
appropriate resonant frequencies and is subjected to large crowds. After
extensive analysis, the problem was fixed by the retrofitting of 37
fluid-viscous dampers (energy dissipating) to control horizontal
movement and 52 tuned mass dampers (inertial) to control vertical
movement. This took from May 2001 to January 2002 and cost £5m. After a
period of testing the bridge was successfully re-opened on 22 February
2002, and as yet there have not been any noticeable severe vibrations.
References
Reaney, Patricia (Nov. 6, 2005). "Why the Millennium
Bridge wobbled". New Sunday Times, p. F20.
|
|
links
|
|
|
www.essential-architecture.com
|
|